Training assessment and diagnosis

Detect your team's training needs and measure the impact of training

Consultancy and technology to assess training needs and measure their results. We design diagnostics and assessments that show you where to invest in development and what return it brings you.

Request information

Assessment and diagnostic platform Competency assessments Consultancy and action plan

Hundreds of companies trust Openmet

Objectives

Good training starts with a good diagnosis

We detect the real training needs and their impact on staff and the organization.

Objective needs diagnosis

We detect training needs and obtain objective data on the team’s competencies, technical knowledge, and skills.

Better-informed training decisions

We identify which training programs are worth investing in and how to make the most of them, with data for team leaders.

Talent development and alignment

We develop internal talent and align individual needs with the company’s needs.

HOW WE WORK

An assessment and diagnostic method with expert guidance

We support you throughout the entire process with our own technology and strategic consultancy.

1

Questionnaire design

We design the questionnaires to detect needs and analyze competencies, knowledge, and skills. For knowledge questionnaires, we work jointly with the company’s specialist technicians.

2

Internal communication advisory

We help you explain the project to the whole organization so the team understands and participates in it.

3

Distribution and data capture

We manage distribution and data capture through electronic surveys.

4

Openmet Feedback Manager results platform

We give you access to our employee experience software to view interactive dashboards with various filtering options and exportable reports, among other features.

5

Action plan and follow-up

We present the results and make recommendations to build an action plan and follow-up.

Want to start a training assessment and diagnostic project?

Contact us

YOUR PARTNER

Why Openmet?
You need a partner, not just software

20+ years of real-world experience

Over two decades assessing and diagnosing the training of people in organizations across every sector.

500+ companies vouch for us

The trust of hundreds of clients certifies the strength and reliability of our methodology.

Proprietary technology

Exclusive Business Intelligence software to analyze results and make data-driven decisions.

Expert guidance

More than a platform. We're a consultancy specialized in training diagnostics and assessments that helps you execute and measure every improvement.

AI-augmented consultancy

More time with you, less spent on document production. We let artificial intelligence work in the background so we can focus where we add value.

Get started now

Start detecting training needs or measuring the impact of training at your company today

By starting, you accept the privacy policy.

BLOG

Latest articles

News, tools, techniques, and advice on training people and training needs

Generational workplace engagement: how to connect with Generation Z

In today’s professional environment, shaped by four generations working side by side within the same organization, generational workplace engagement has become a strategic factor. Measuring workplace climate in a general way is no longer enough: companies need to understand how different generations experience engagement at work and what drives their motivation. The large-scale entry of Generation Z into the workforce, alongside millennials, Generation X, and baby boomers, is forcing organizations to rethink talent management. Each group interprets work through different values, expectations, and ways of relating to the company. Talking about employee engagement today inevitably means talking about intergenerational engagement. Understanding generational differences at work Engagement across generations is not built in a uniform way. Each generation has been shaped by a different economic, technological, and social context, which directly impacts its relationship with work. Baby Boomers (1946-1964): They value stability, career progression, and recognition for accumulated experience. Their engagement is often linked to organizational loyalty and rewards that reflect long-term dedication. Generation X (1965-1980): They seek autonomy, work-life balance, and merit-based development. In terms of generational employee engagement, this generation responds well to clear structures and growth opportunities based on results. Millennials (1981-1996): Purpose is key. They need to understand the impact of their work and receive continuous feedback. Flexibility and a collaborative culture directly influence their engagement at work. Generation Z (1997-2012): Generation Z’s motivation at work is strongly connected to authenticity, diversity, and social impact. They are digital natives, expect efficient tech-enabled environments, and value organizational transparency. In the workplace, Generation Z prioritizes stability, continuous development, and consistency between what a company says and what it actually does. How to improve employee engagement across generations Designing a generational employee engagement strategy does not mean creating four different plans. It means building a flexible model that responds to diverse needs within a shared culture. 1 – Define a shared purpose All generations look for meaning in their work, even if they express it differently. A clear organizational purpose acts as a connecting axis. For millennials and Generation Z, that purpose must align with social and environmental values. For baby boomers and Generation X, it should reflect stability, tangible impact, and professional recognition. A well-communicated purpose strengthens intergenerational engagement because it creates a shared framework of identity. 2 – Introduce structured flexibility Flexibility matters to everyone, but its meaning varies: For Generation X, it means work-life balance. For millennials, autonomy. For Generation Z, digital integration and mobility. For baby boomers, a gradual transition toward less rigid models. Implementing hybrid policies, adaptable schedules, and wellbeing programs strengthens engagement across generations and reduces internal friction. 3 – Use technology as an enabler, not a barrier At work, Generation Z expects speed and efficient digitalization. However, a generational employee engagement strategy must avoid excluding other generations through abrupt digital transformation. The key is to combine intuitive digital tools with clear processes and supportive training. Technology should be an intergenerational bridge, not a segmentation factor. 4 – Personalize recognition Recognition directly impacts engagement at work, but not all generations value it in the same way: Baby boomers: formal recognition and stability. Generation X: recognition based on results. Millennials: frequent feedback and development. Generation Z: visibility, learning, and accelerated growth. Effective multigenerational management adapts recognition systems without breaking cultural coherence. 5 – Measure engagement by generation This is where many organizations fall short. They measure workplace climate in aggregate, without segmenting by generation. If you truly want to improve generational employee engagement, you need to: Analyze data by generational cohort. Identify differences in leadership perception. Detect gaps in professional development. Assess expectations around growth and stability. Segmented analysis makes it possible to design targeted strategies without fragmenting organizational culture. Intergenerational engagement as a competitive advantage Managing engagement across generations is not just an HR issue, but a matter of organizational sustainability. Companies that understand multigenerational management as a strategic advantage achieve: Higher talent retention. Lower turnover among younger profiles. Knowledge transfer between generations. Innovation by combining experience with a digital mindset. Generational employee engagement is not about prioritizing Generation Z over other generations. It’s about balancing expectations to build an inclusive, adaptable, and resilient workplace. Conclusion The future of work will not be uniform or linear. It will be diverse, digital, and multigenerational. Organizations that want to strengthen engagement at work must understand that motivation is not activated by a single lever. Each generation responds to different stimuli, but they all share one common need: to feel heard, valued, and aligned with the company’s purpose. Working on generational employee engagement helps turn that diversity into cohesion. And when engagement is built through intergenerational understanding, culture stops being a message and becomes a real experience. Do you want to improve generational employee engagement in your organization? Measure engagement by generation, identify cultural gaps, and design strategies based on real data. Request information and start building a workplace that connects with every generation.

Remote Work and Engagement: How to Align Culture, Leadership, and Commitment in Distributed Teams

Remote work is no longer a trend; it is a consolidated organizational architecture. Companies that once saw it as a simple operational adjustment now realize that the real challenge was not technology, but commitment. Employee engagement, that emotional and strategic bond between individuals and the organization, transforms when the shared physical space disappears. The question is no longer whether remote work works. The question is how to sustain commitment in environments where culture is not absorbed in hallways, but transmitted through screens. Remote Work Redefines Employee Engagement For years, engagement relied on in-person dynamics: spontaneous meetings, informal conversations, shared rituals. In remote work settings, these interactions stop being natural and must instead be intentionally designed. When there is no conscious design, disconnection appears. It is not always visible. It does not always translate into immediate underperformance. But it begins to erode motivation, identification with purpose, and collaboration. Engagement in remote environments depends less on physical proximity and more on organizational clarity. Clarity in objectives, expectations, decision-making, and individual impact within the system. Organizational Culture in Remote Environments: From Implicit to Explicit In on-site models, culture is almost absorbed by osmosis. In remote models, if it is not clearly defined, it fades. Organizations that maintain high levels of commitment in distributed teams understand that organizational culture must be made visible. This means translating values into observable behaviors, establishing clear collaboration norms, and aligning leadership and communication with strategic purpose. Remote work does not weaken culture; it exposes it. When there is coherence between discourse and practice, commitment strengthens. When there is not, distance amplifies misalignment. Remote Leadership: From Control to Strategic Direction One of the biggest mistakes in managing remote work is attempting to replicate the on-site model through constant supervision. Control-based leadership creates friction in environments where autonomy is a core value. Effective remote leadership is grounded in clear strategic direction, outcome-based follow-up, and structured communication. People do not need to be permanently connected; they need to understand where the organization is heading and how their work contributes to that direction. Engagement increases when there is shared purpose and when feedback is continuous rather than occasional. In distributed teams, organizational silence is interpreted as disconnection. People Analytics and Measuring Engagement in Remote Work Commitment cannot be managed by perception alone. Organizations working with hybrid or fully remote teams need measurement systems that integrate data on climate, performance, turnover, and collaboration. This is where the People Analytics approach becomes essential. Analyzing patterns makes it possible to detect early signs of disengagement, overload, or cultural misalignment before they impact critical results. Remote work demands evidence-based management. Measuring employee engagement is not about control; it is about organizational understanding. Companies that integrate data into their talent strategy can anticipate risks and design more precise interventions. Organizational Coherence: The True Differentiating Factor In remote settings, every digital interaction reflects the culture. If an organization promotes flexibility but demands constant availability, the implicit message contradicts the explicit one. If trust is emphasized but mistakes are penalized, commitment quietly erodes. Engagement does not depend on where people work from. It depends on the organizational system that supports that work. The debate between on-site and remote loses relevance compared to a more strategic question: is the organization aligned across culture, leadership, and metrics? When that alignment exists, remote work not only sustains commitment but can strengthen it. It broadens access to talent, encourages autonomy, and requires a more professional approach to internal communication. Conclusion Remote work has changed the way organizations operate, but it has also raised the standard for managing commitment. Employee engagement in distributed teams does not emerge by chance, but from the conscious design of culture, leadership, and measurement systems. Companies that understand this transformation do not simply manage people at a distance. They design coherent organizations, data-driven and purpose-oriented. In this context, engagement ceases to be an intangible aspiration and becomes a measurable competitive advantage. Do You Want to Measure and Strengthen Engagement in Your Organization? Remote work requires a data-driven approach to managing commitment, not intuition. At Openmet, we help organizations analyze, understand, and optimize engagement through People Analytics solutions aligned with their culture and strategy. If you want to transform the way you manage talent in hybrid or remote environments, talk to our team and discover how to turn commitment into a real competitive advantage.

People Analytics or Traditional Consulting: How to Improve Engagement and Employee Experience with Real Impact

In recent years, concepts such as People Analytics, employee engagement, and employee experience (Employee Experience) have moved from being trends to becoming key elements of HR strategy. However, as organizations adopt new tools and metrics, a recurring question arises: Which approach is truly more effective in improving people’s commitment: People Analytics or traditional consulting? The answer is not about choosing one over the other, but about understanding how decisions are made within the organization and the role data plays in that process. People Analytics: measuring to make better decisions People Analytics is based on the use of data and analysis to understand what is happening within the organization and to anticipate how people’s experience will evolve. Its value lies not only in measurement, but in enabling more informed and more frequent decisions. When applied correctly, this approach helps detect early signs of disengagement, identify behavioral patterns, and act before issues become embedded. It also allows managers and HR teams to work with objective information, reducing reliance on intuition or isolated perceptions. In practice, People Analytics is especially useful when an organization needs agility, makes decisions on a regular basis, and is prepared to work with data continuously. When measurement is not enough One of the most common mistakes in People Analytics projects is assuming that more data automatically leads to better results. Reality is often quite different. When metrics are collected continuously but there is no clear framework for interpretation or real capacity for action, data turns into noise. Surveys lose credibility, engagement declines, and the organization ends up measuring a lot… but deciding very little. This is where a key element comes into play: expert judgment. Without context, prioritization, and strategic interpretation, People Analytics loses much of its potential. The contribution of traditional HR consulting Traditional human resources consulting and employee climate surveys continue to play a relevant role, especially when an organization needs a deep and structural perspective. This approach provides cultural context, strategic analysis, and external benchmarks that help explain the “why” behind the data. It is particularly valuable during organizational transformations, leadership changes, or the redesign of management models. Its main limitation is not the quality of the diagnosis, but the pace. When analysis cycles are long and decisions are made infrequently, the real impact on engagement can become diluted. The question that makes the difference Beyond tools and methodologies, there is one question that often proves decisive: How often can your organization make data-driven decisions about people? If decisions are reviewed once a year, continuous measurement loses its meaning. If, on the contrary, the environment requires rapid adaptation, waiting for occasional diagnostics can become a barrier. The key is not the sophistication of the model, but its fit with the organization’s real capacity to act. The Openmet approach: balance between data, context, and action At Openmet, we start from a simple idea: measurement is not an end in itself. Value emerges when data helps drive better decisions and activate meaningful change. That’s why we work with a hybrid approach that combines: Continuous measurement of engagement and employee experience. Expert analysis to interpret results. Clear prioritization of actions. Follow-up to assess whether decisions generate real impact. The goal is not to accumulate indicators, but to turn information about people into decisions that are useful for the business. Before choosing a model, it’s worth asking Before committing to People Analytics, traditional consulting, or a combination of both, it’s advisable to reflect on a few key points: How often decisions are made in HR and leadership. The level of analytical maturity within the organization. Whether the goal is a one-off diagnosis, continuous action, or both. The expected impact on engagement, turnover, or performance. Answering these questions often helps avoid investments that measure well but transform very little. Conclusion People Analytics and traditional consulting are not opposing approaches. Real impact emerges when data, context, and expert judgment are combined and aligned with the organization’s reality. Because improving employee experience is not about measuring more, but about making better decisions. Do you want to know if your organization is ready to make data-driven decisions about people?At Openmet, we help you turn People Analytics into real impact on engagement and business outcomes.

View all articles